Featured
Is This the End of Trump’s Trade War on Canada?
TL;DR: The U.S. Supreme Court just heard arguments on the legality of President Trump’s sweeping “emergency” tariffs. While Canada isn’t the primary target the fallout affects us directly. Our economic fate currently rests with nine American judges rather than our own trade negotiators.
It is November 2025 and the economic anxiety in Ottawa is palpable as all eyes turn to Washington. The U.S. Supreme Court has just heard oral arguments in the historic case that will determine if President Trump’s “emergency” universal tariffs are actually legal. We are living in a strange timeline where Canada’s economic fate rests not in the hands of our own tenacious negotiators but on the nuanced interpretation of a 1977 American statute by nine foreign judges.
In a timely discussion featured on The Hub podcast this week UBC constitutional law expert Geoffrey Sigalet broke down this high-stakes gamble. The core of the issue is President Trump’s aggressive use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). He has used this act to impose sweeping tariffs by claiming that chronic trade imbalances and border security issues like the fentanyl crisis constitute a national emergency.
Challengers in the U.S. argue that their Constitution explicitly grants Congress the power over tariffs and trade. They claim the President cannot simply seize that power by declaring an emergency under a law that does not even use the word “tariff” in its text.
Reports from the courtroom today suggest the conservative-majority court is skeptical of Trump’s broad interpretation of his powers. This is the rich irony of our current situation. Canada might be saved by the very conservative legal movement that Trump helped build because legal conservatives often hate executive overreach more than they love partisan policy wins.
If the Court sides with the President it cements a new reality where crippling American protectionism can be deployed on a whim. If they side with the challengers it could mean a massive and immediate rollback of these damaging duties.
While we wait for a ruling we have to ask ourselves some hard questions about how we got here.
Why is our national economic strategy so fragile that it can be derailed by one man’s creative interpretation of a forty-year-old emergency law? And why are we reduced to cheering from the sidelines for American judges to do the heavy lifting our own diplomats could not manage?
Join us on X and Facebook to share your thoughts.
SOURCES
- The Hub (Podcast): ‘Bet against the president winning’: Could an American Supreme Court ruling save Canadian trade? featuring Geoffrey Sigalet.
- The Guardian (Live News Blog): Trump news at a glance: supreme court examines president’s global tariffs.
- CBS News (Article): Supreme Court justices seem skeptical of Trump’s sweeping tariffs.
- Chatham House (Analysis): Trump’s tariffs face Supreme Court challenge that could have significant consequences for presidential power.
Featured
Is your Bay of Quinte property subject to Cowichan-style “clouded title”?
TL;DR: “Cowichan-style” property revolution could hit Ontario, specifically targeting the Bay of Quinte. For local homeowners and investors, the gold-standard “fee simple” deed is evolving into a model of shared jurisdiction. With the Culbertson Tract and Surrender 24 claims casting a shadow over Deseronto and Tyendinaga, residents face a future where land titles are permanently clouded, making property rights a collaborative—and complicated—process.
For decades, property owners in Ontario operated under a comfortable legal assumption. They believed that once the Crown granted a deed to private land, any underlying Aboriginal title was extinguished. However, a recent Bay of Quinte Land Claims Analysis highlights how a series of landmark legal shifts in British Columbia have shattered that certainty. Rulings regarding the Cowichan Tribes and the Haida Nation suggest that Aboriginal title and private property can coexist. As these legal precedents ripple across Canada, residents in Ontario are asking if the Bay of Quinte region is next.
In British Columbia, the Cowichan Tribes claim led to a revolutionary legal acknowledgement. The courts found that land never formally surrendered via treaty remains subject to Aboriginal title even if private homes and municipal infrastructure now sit upon it. This created a “clouded title” scenario where the First Nation holds a legal interest in the land alongside the private owner. For the youthful entrepreneur who relies on land value for business loans, this is a direct threat. Uncertainty is the ultimate enemy of investment, and “clouded titles” effectively act as a regulatory tax on the next generation. The provincial government must provide absolute financial guarantees to deed holders to maintain economic stability, or risk stifling the very growth Ontario needs.
To determine the susceptibility of the Bay of Quinte, we must look at the starting line of the law. Most of British Columbia is unceded land. In contrast, the Bay of Quinte is Treaty Land governed by the Simcoe Deed of 1793. Because a treaty exists, the legal battle in Quinte is about breach of contract rather than proving title from scratch. The Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte (MBQ) argue that the Crown illegally took or sold off portions of their treaty land without proper consent. This creates a “two-driver” system of shared jurisdiction that complicates the Canadian identity of “one law for all.” A unified regulatory environment is essential to ensure Ontario remains competitive on a global scale, yet we are drifting toward a fragmented legal landscape.
Flashpoints like the Culbertson Tract and Surrender 24 make the region a prime candidate for legal tension. The Culbertson Tract claim includes much of the Town of Deseronto. While a portion was settled in 2022 through a federal purchase, hundreds of acres remain under claim. Surrender 24 involves roughly 33,000 acres where the MBQ assert that an 1820 surrender was fraudulent. While Ontario has historically used a “Willing Buyer, Willing Seller” model, this slow-motion remedy creates an economic “limbo” that devalues property while the Crown takes years to act. It is a market-friendly theory that, in practice, leaves individual owners caught in the crossfire of 200-year-old disputes.
The probability of a Cowichan-style situation in the Bay of Quinte is moderate to high. While residents are unlikely to face the loss of their homes, they are highly susceptible to a future of shared jurisdiction. The legal trend in Canada is moving away from winner-take-all property rights and toward a model where Indigenous title survives the issuance of private deeds. The era of absolute fee simple certainty is likely over. The region is entering a period of “reconciliation property rights” where the Simcoe Deed and private property deeds will have to learn to live side by side.
Is your backyard truly yours if the title is “clouded” by a 200-year-old contract dispute? How can the next generation of Canadian homeowners find security in an era of “shared jurisdiction”?
Business
A Cold One With a Hot Temper
In Alberta, an altercation on a golf course this summer led to a former NHL player getting a beer named after him.
Nick Tarnasky, a former professional fighter and enforcer for teams like the Tampa Bay Lightning and Florida Panthers, found his on-ice skills useful on the links.
The incident occurred at the Alberta Springs Golf Resort in Red Deer. The issue was slow play. A video went viral showing Tarnasky arguing with another golfer, Trevor Ogilvie. The video shows Ogilvie charging at Tarnasky, who then throws him into a water hazard. Ogilvie gets out and re-engages, receiving a couple of swift punches for his trouble.
The video quickly gained online attention. Calgary’s Common Crown Brewing Co. created a limited-edition brew called “The Tarnasky,” a “smooth-hitting IPA,” which sold out almost immediately.
Ogilvie later posted an apology video on Facebook, admitting he “played 36 holes of golf, drank way too much, and my mouth ran faster than my brain.” The RCMP were called, but no charges were laid.
Join us here on X or here on Facebook to comment on this article.
Canada
Canada’s Call to Service
A recent poll shows most Canadians support a new form of mandatory national service. Most support is limited to civilian roles to unite the country, address labor shortages, and help young people gain skills and a sense of purpose. Not to mention the obvious boost to Canadian military readiness.
For decades, mandatory national service has felt like a relic. However, a recent National Post poll has revealed that an overwhelming majority of Canadians are ready to embrace it.
A modern form of national service is an idea that transcends political divides. Over 70% of Canadians support mandatory service in civilian roles, from environmental conservation to public health.

This is a pragmatic solution to a handful of real challenges like a looming labor shortage, an aging population, and a country that is being pulled apart. This is an opportunity to foster a deeper understanding of our vast country. It’s an investment in a collective identity, forging bonds that social media cannot.
Even a small percentage of participants continuing with military service could provide a steady stream of recruits, addressing chronic understaffing issues. We don’t need a massive standing army, but we do need to ensure our defense forces have the personnel they need to protect a country the size of a continent.
As a journey, the benefits of a national service program would be significant. For young people, it’s a gap year with a purpose and a chance to gain invaluable life skills, explore new places, and find a deeper connection to their communities. It is a better use of a year than endlessly scrolling through TikTok.
A mandatory service program could be the modern equivalent of the trans-Canada railway. A national project that connects us with shared experiences and a renewed sense of purpose.
Join us here on X or here on Facebook to comment on this article.
-
Letter1 month agoLETTER: Thank you Belleville Christmas angels!
-
Business1 month ago12 Brutal truths for a breakout 2026
-
Business4 weeks agoTrenval Business Development Corporation: The Secret Business Funding Weapon for Quinte Business Owners
-
Business1 week ago6 Predictions for 2026: The Death of Job Hugging and the Rise of the Portfolio Professional
-
History1 month agoEchoes of the Bay: The Wild True Story of Belleville’s Own Mackenzie Bowell
-
Featured2 weeks agoIs your Bay of Quinte property subject to Cowichan-style “clouded title”?
-
Local2 weeks agoBelleville Police Furious: Charges Dropped as Courts “Run Out of Time”
-
Business1 week agoIn Hastings County local entrepreneurs are getting paid to solve the housing crisis
